Meta’s Monopoly Trial: The Future of Social Media at Stake

Alexis Rios • May 12, 2025

The FTC's Case Against Meta

The intense battle between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta over allegations of monopolistic practices has the potential to reshape the landscape of social media and big tech as we know it.


In a move that would later become central to the FTC's case, Meta purchased Instagram for $1 billion in April 2012, followed by WhatsApp for $19 billion. Then, in December 2020, the FTC, in conjunction with 46 states, filed a lawsuit against Meta alleging illegal monopolization. This lawsuit specifically focused on the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, arguing that Meta employed a "buy or bury" strategy to eliminate potential competitors. While the initial complaint faced difficulties and was dismissed, an amended complaint was subsequently filed, and the case eventually went to trial in April 2025.

Meta's Defense: Growth, Improvement, and a Changing Landscape

According to Meta, they "...acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to improve and grow them alongside Facebook," the company's attorney Mark Hansen argued. "But the FTC claims that Meta '...They decided that competition was too hard, and it would be easier to buy out their rivals than to compete with them,'" said Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawyer Daniel Matheson. Basically, like a social network monopoly.  

The seal of the trade commission of the united states of america

Since 2011, the social media platforms have changed, and they aren't the same when it comes to posting, sharing, and adding friends. "The amount that people are sharing with friends on Facebook, especially, has been declining," Zuckerberg said. "Even the number of new friends that people add ... I think has been declining. But I don't know the exact numbers." Messaging between individuals or friend groups is becoming more popular than sharing content on more public social media feeds. 


Meta's Competition: YouTube

Although Meta owns Facebook and Instagram, they still face competition, mainly with Google's YouTube. YouTube is popular amongst online content creators/influencers and younger audiences. Pew Research found that nine in 10 US teens use YouTube, while Facebook usage has "steeply declined" over the past decade among that age group. Due to the video type of format and the ability to have longer videos, people can spend more time on YouTube than on Facebook and Instagram combined. 


Zuckerburg's Early Concerns and the Stakes of the Trial

Even before the lawsuit was filed, in 2018 Mark Zuckerberg raised concerns about this and the chance of spinning out Insta and WhatsApp. But Meta didn't end up spinning Instagram or WhatsApp off, and it's now he is in court fighting the FTC to avoid having to do just that. 


In 2012, Zuckerberg appeared to realize that Facebook's now-defunct Facebook Camera service was falling behind Instagram in functionality and popularity."In the time it has taken us to get our act together on this, Instagram has become a large and viable competitor to us on mobile photos, which will increasingly1 be the future of photos,"2 Zuckerberg wrote in an email at the time in 2012. 


Even though YouTube is a threat to Meta, still, Meta holds a firm grip on the social media market, especially in the US, according to Pew Research, where it operates a quarter of the most widely-used social media platforms. As the trial continues, it will be interesting to see how it affects the online space. Especially since there's a lot at stake for Meta, as it could be forced to offload Instagram and WhatsApp if it loses. 


How This Could Impact Digital Marketing

The trial's outcome could reshape digital marketing. If Meta is forced to split up Instagram and WhatsApp, advertisers would most likely lose the ability to run unified campaigns across platforms. This would make audience targeting, data tracking, and content distribution more complex. Marketers may need to diversify faster, relying more on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and others to maintain reach and results.

Share

Billboard reading “THE BILLBOARD TEST” on a gray sign against a blue sky.
By Performance Digital • October 6, 2026
Learn why short headlines, minimal copy, and clear visual hierarchy can improve display ad and landing page performance and help drive more clicks.
Robot elephant in a modern office, surrounded by coworkers watching it attentively
September 23, 2026
A practical look at where AI helps marketers and where human judgement still matters.
Three AI Generated event flyers: boba tea sale, neon concert night, and big pizza sale
By Performance Digital • September 15, 2026
There's an instinct among certain business owners to keep up with the latest marketing trends, and right now, the trend is AI flyers. They're scattered across social media and aside from sales and promotions, can communicate a lot about what or who a brand is. The instinct is understandable, and for many business owners, a quick solution that can potentially elevate their brand is exactly what they need. The low barrier to entry seems attractive to someone who's already strapped for time and may not be able to afford a professional designer on a weekly basis, but here are a few things to consider and ask yourself before putting one of these flyers together.
Human hand reaching toward a robotic hand on a white background
By Performance Digital • September 8, 2026
There’s a sentence I hear more and more often in digital marketing conversations: “Well, can’t I just use AI to make that?” And the answer is… probably. You can use AI to write a blog, create social posts, generate an image, draft an email, come up with Google Ads headlines or build a content calendar in seconds. I’m not going to tell you that’s a bad thing. We use AI, too. It has made parts of our jobs faster, helped us work through ideas and given marketers access to tools we couldn’t have imagined a few years ago. But being able to make something and knowing what you should make are two very different things. 
Laptop screen showing “OMNICHANNEL MARKETING” with digital communication icons
By Performance Digital • September 2, 2026
Running ads on every platform feels like progress. But if the same message is just copied from one channel to the next, you’re leaving your best growth on the table. Here’s the difference, and why it matters most for small and medium businesses. If you run a small or medium business, you’re probably already doing more marketing than you get credit for. You’re on Google. You’re on Instagram and Facebook. Maybe you’ve dabbled in YouTube, sent a few emails, or put your name on a billboard. By most definitions, you’re “everywhere.” That’s multichannel marketing, and it’s a solid foundation. But being present on a lot of channels isn’t the same as making those channels work together. The businesses that pull ahead aren’t the ones on the most platforms. They’re the ones running omnichannel campaigns: one clear idea, adapted to each channel and each audience, so the whole thing feels like a single, coordinated story. For a business with a limited budget, that distinction isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s the difference between spending money to be seen and spending money to be remembered.
Hands around a table reviewing colorful business charts and graphs on papers and tablets.
By Alexis Rios • August 26, 2026
What Is Marketing Data?