Meta’s Monopoly Trial: The Future of Social Media at Stake

Performance Digital • May 12, 2025

The FTC's Case Against Meta

The intense battle between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta over allegations of monopolistic practices has the potential to reshape the landscape of social media and big tech as we know it.


In a move that would later become central to the FTC's case, Meta purchased Instagram for $1 billion in April 2012, followed by WhatsApp for $19 billion. Then, in December 2020, the FTC, in conjunction with 46 states, filed a lawsuit against Meta alleging illegal monopolization. This lawsuit specifically focused on the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, arguing that Meta employed a "buy or bury" strategy to eliminate potential competitors. While the initial complaint faced difficulties and was dismissed, an amended complaint was subsequently filed, and the case eventually went to trial in April 2025.

Meta's Defense: Growth, Improvement, and a Changing Landscape

According to Meta, they "...acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to improve and grow them alongside Facebook," the company's attorney Mark Hansen argued. "But the FTC claims that Meta '...They decided that competition was too hard, and it would be easier to buy out their rivals than to compete with them,'" said Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawyer Daniel Matheson. Basically, like a social network monopoly.  

Since 2011, the social media platforms have changed, and they aren't the same when it comes to posting, sharing, and adding friends. "The amount that people are sharing with friends on Facebook, especially, has been declining," Zuckerberg said. "Even the number of new friends that people add ... I think has been declining. But I don't know the exact numbers." Messaging between individuals or friend groups is becoming more popular than sharing content on more public social media feeds. 


Meta's Competition: YouTube

Although Meta owns Facebook and Instagram, they still face competition, mainly with Google's YouTube. YouTube is popular amongst online content creators/influencers and younger audiences. Pew Research found that nine in 10 US teens use YouTube, while Facebook usage has "steeply declined" over the past decade among that age group. Due to the video type of format and the ability to have longer videos, people can spend more time on YouTube than on Facebook and Instagram combined. 


Zuckerburg's Early Concerns and the Stakes of the Trial

Even before the lawsuit was filed, in 2018 Mark Zuckerberg raised concerns about this and the chance of spinning out Insta and WhatsApp. But Meta didn't end up spinning Instagram or WhatsApp off, and it's now he is in court fighting the FTC to avoid having to do just that. 


In 2012, Zuckerberg appeared to realize that Facebook's now-defunct Facebook Camera service was falling behind Instagram in functionality and popularity."In the time it has taken us to get our act together on this, Instagram has become a large and viable competitor to us on mobile photos, which will increasingly1 be the future of photos,"2 Zuckerberg wrote in an email at the time in 2012. 


Even though YouTube is a threat to Meta, still, Meta holds a firm grip on the social media market, especially in the US, according to Pew Research, where it operates a quarter of the most widely-used social media platforms. As the trial continues, it will be interesting to see how it affects the online space. Especially since there's a lot at stake for Meta, as it could be forced to offload Instagram and WhatsApp if it loses. 


How This Could Impact Digital Marketing

The trial's outcome could reshape digital marketing. If Meta is forced to split up Instagram and WhatsApp, advertisers would most likely lose the ability to run unified campaigns across platforms. This would make audience targeting, data tracking, and content distribution more complex. Marketers may need to diversify faster, relying more on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and others to maintain reach and results.

Share

A collage of photos of women wearing prettylittlething brand dresses
By Performance Digital April 21, 2025
Founded in 2012, PrettyLittleThing quickly became a go-to online fashion retailer for bold, trend-driven styles at affordable prices. The brand, a subsidiary of Boohoo Group, became a staple for Gen Z and millennial shoppers with its glam aesthetic, flashy campaigns, celebrity collaborations, and emphasis on inclusivity. Known for its bodycon dresses, bright colors, and head-turning designs, PLT made its mark by leaning into the fast-fashion space with unapologetic confidence and a strong, recognizable voice.  From Loud & Proud to Quiet & Confused PrettyLittleThing built its reputation on being loud, unapologetically fun, and fiercely Gen Z. Think neon bodysuits, rhinestones, and festival-ready fits that screamed “main character energy.” But in a surprising shift, PLT’s rebrand introduced minimalist designs, earthy tones, and a stripped-back website that looked more like a luxury boutique than a fast-fashion powerhouse. According to The Cut , the rebrand didn’t just confuse customers—it alienated them. PLT fans were quick to note the lack of size inclusivity, dramatic changes to product styles, and a tone that no longer felt “for them.” As one viral comment pointed out, “PrettyLittleThing is now PrettyConfusedCustomer.”
Two phones , one with the ChatGPT logo and one with the Google logo
By Performance Digital April 16, 2025
ChatGPT Search vs Google: Who's Winning the AI Search Battle? Towards the end of last year, OpenAI launched ChatGPT Search, a search tool designed to provide users with instant, concise answers while linking to sources. Unlike traditional search engines, ChatGPT Search eliminates the need to sift through multiple web pages. However, its biggest drawback is that it provides a limited number of sources, potentially leaving out valuable information. ( Source ) Google quickly responded by integrating its AI model, Gemini, into search results, offering "AI Overviews" that provide summarized responses with source links, while still keeping traditional SEO-driven results. ( Source ) Is ChatGTP Search a Google Killer? Despite its growing popularity, ChatGPT Search is nowhere near overtaking Google. Here’s how they compare: Google Search: Over 5 trillion searches in 2024 (about 14 billion per day ), with a 93.57% market share ( Source ) ChatGPT Search: Estimated 37.5 million queries per day , making up just 0.25% of the market ( Source ) For now, Google remains the dominant search engine, handling 373 times more searches than ChatGPT in 2024. The Challenges of AI-Powered Search While AI search tools offer fast and direct answers, they come with limitations: Lack of Multiple Sources: Unlike Google, ChatGPT often references just one source per answer, making it harder to verify information. Limited Location Accuracy: ChatGPT can infer general location from an IP address but doesn’t actively track users like Google Maps, leading to less accurate local search results.